Who reviews the reviewers? Who edits the editors? Many avenues for you to hold BJSM accountable.

نویسندگان

  • Karim M Khan
  • Babette M Pluim
چکیده

Being open and transparent creates trust is one of the BMJ Publishing Group’s nine values. Does the BJSM leadership team act openly and transparently to deserve the trust of our community? We put our case here but we leave the verdict to our valued readers and respected communities (including our 19 member societies who total over 12 000 subscribers). When we consider ‘BJSM’ we refer to the broad range of content that can be considered to start from bjsm.bmj.com. In addition to our 24 annual issues, BJSM is a dynamic, versatile contributor to health education and debate via >200 podcasts, 60 YouTube videos and >300 blog posts. We engage with a vast community on Facebook and Twitter—and these are two-way media where BJSM content can rapidly be tagged, trolled or trumpeted. In total, 4.5 million BJSM pages are viewed each year. If this volume of content did not generate debate and criticism it would be time to sack the Editorial team.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reluctant reviewers? Publons may help

Nursing Open continues to grow, submissions are frequent and regular, and we are putting ever larger issues online. Naturally, the volume of submissions to Nursing Open does not match those to my other journal JAN, but the latter is long established, has a relatively high impact factor and an international reputation. Nursing Open is still new and along with growing the volume of submissions an...

متن کامل

What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?

CONTEXT Selecting peer reviewers who will provide high-quality reviews is a central task of editors of biomedical journals. OBJECTIVES To determine the characteristics of reviewers for a general medical journal who produce high-quality reviews and to describe the characteristics of a good review, particularly in terms of the time spent reviewing and turnaround time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PAR...

متن کامل

Acknowledgment to Guest Associate Editors and Reviewers (2008)

M anufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM) formally thanks the guest associate editors and reviewers, who provided expert counsel and guidance on a voluntary basis. Through their efforts the journal was able to provide submitting authors with timely, thoughtful, and constructive reviews. In fact, for papers submitted in 2008, M&SOM received 514 reviews from 277 individuals. Remarkab...

متن کامل

A Glaring Paradox

W HEN you crash your bike and bang up your body, do you go to the experienced orthopedic surgeon or the one just out of residency? When you crash your car and the other driver sues for negligence, do you prefer the advice of a senior attorney who has won a raft of cases or the recent law school graduate? When your hard drive crashes, do you take it to the computer specialist who has run the sho...

متن کامل

Editor's Note

This issue comes with changes in our web page and the addition of a group of scholars who have graciously accepted to be our advisory board members. PLSJ was a challenge in Persian studies in Iran and was faced with quite a few obstacles in these five volumes. The ministry of higher education still does not consider PLSJ as an academic journal and does not list in its approved list of journals!...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • British journal of sports medicine

دوره 49 20  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015